we need organized screening programs everywhere – programs that ensure people are screened at the right time, with the appropriate test, and get the follow-up they need. currently there are no organized cervical cancer screening programs in quebec, prince edward island, yukon, northwest territories or nunavut, so work will be required to partner with these jurisdictions and build the infrastructure.
we should also look at training and technology. in some cases, there may be a need to re-train cytotechnologists because hpv testing uses different technology for analysis than pap testing. however, in many places the technology used for analyzing hpv tests is similar to that used for genotyping covid-19 tests, so it is possible that investments recently made there could be used for hpv testing post-pandemic. while health canada has approved some devices that can be used for hpv self-sampling, each jurisdiction must still validate and make reimbursement decisions about their use.
at the same time, we need primary care providers to understand and champion hpv testing. and we must be cognizant of how we talk about hpv screening with individuals to avoid any sense of blame and shame associated with hpv as a sexually transmitted infection. the fact is, hpv primary screening should simply become a routine test for all eligible people, every five years.
globally, a number of
other countries, including australia and the united kingdom, have already moved to hpv screening. australia began in 2017. it has also been using the self-sampling hpv test at medical centres. overall, australia expects that the hpv test will protect up to
one-third more women than the pap test did. the u.k. switched in
2019, and during the pandemic it also rolled out a pilot test of
home-based hpv screening for people in certain regions who were at least 15 months overdue for a check.