he said his job in the election will be to convince canadians that paying to combat climate change now, despite the ongoing affordability crisis, will be beneficial to them in the long term because of the economic benefits of converting canada’s fossil-fuel based economy to green energy technology.
that’s what he said. here are the problems with it.
first, trudeau argued that his carbon tax — currently $80 per tonne of industrial greenhouse gas emissions rising by almost 19% to $95 per tonne on april 1, 2025 on its way to $170 per tonne on april 1, 2030 — leaves eight out of 10 households paying it (everywhere but quebec and b.c. that have separate systems) better off, because of quarterly climate action incentives payments.
but that ignores the finding by independent parliamentary budget officer yves giroux that when factoring in the economic damage caused by trudeau’s carbon tax, 60% of families actually pay more in carbon taxes than they receive in incentive payments.
second, trudeau said he put a price on carbon because it’s more economically efficient at reducing emissions than government regulations or subsidies.
but in the real world, trudeau’s carbon tax is a relatively minor contributor to reducing emissions.