while fifa and the governments of countries and cities hosting world cup events typically churn out studies claiming huge economic benefits, many economists are skeptical of them, noting claims of increased tourism and boosted economic activity fail to factor in potential visitors who avoid the country or city in which the games are being held because of higher prices, increased traffic and transit congestion and other disruptions caused by the event.
similarly, claims of long-term increases in tourism and economic activity as a result of hosting the games are often intangible and difficult to measure.
overwhelming disdain for fifa tournament
an
angus reid survey of 1,803 adults living in the two canadian host cities conducted may 7 to 11, revealed an overwhelming disdain for the fifa tournament and the hype surrounding it.
seven-in-10 residents surveyed in the greater toronto area and 72% in metro vancouver said holding the games was not worth the cost to taxpayers.
in both the gta and metro vancouver, more people said they were “disinterested” in watching matches (59% and 51% respectively) than those excited about seeing them (39%, and 34% respectively).
sixty-eight percent in the gta and 69% in metro vancouver said they cause too much disruption for city residents.
seventy-four percent in the gta and 57% in greater vancouver don’t trust their provincial governments to be transparent about the total costs of hosting the games.
fifty-eight percent in the gta and 60% in metro vancouver say the same thing about their municipal governments.
mostly benefits fifa, sponsors and big business
four in five residents in both cities believe hosting the games will mostly benefit fifa, sponsors and big business.
seventy-six percent in both cities object to cancelling local summer festivals and gatherings that compete with fifa events.