stay up to date on this topic
a new study has found that patients overwhelmingly support immediate access to their test results even if this means receiving bad news before they have a chance to talk to their doctor.
the research,
published in the journal jama network open, comes almost a year after the u.s. implemented new federal rules that make it mandatory for health-care providers to make nearly all test results and clinical notes immediately available to patients. although research has suggested this practice empowers patients to become more active participants their own care, there were concerns that access to this information without a doctor present could do more harm than good.
“online patient portals have emerged as important tools for increasing patient engagement,”
said catherine m. desroches, co-senior author of the study and executive director of opennotes, the international movement based at beth israel deaconess medical center (bidmc) in boston. “they enable patients to access information, participate in medical decision-making and to communicate with clinicians. prior studies performed by opennotes investigators established immediate release of clinical notes as a recommended best practice.
“however, releasing test results to patients immediately, often before a clinician can provide counselling and context, was yet to be studied widely and remains controversial.”
releasing results before clinician can counsel has been controversial
to gain a better of sense of how patients feel, desroches, who is also an associate professor at harvard medical school, helped distribute surveys to more than 43,000 patients and care partners from april 2021 to april 2022. these 29-question surveys, which were sent to major medical centres across the u.s., covered a range of topics, including test result information, result review behaviour and, most importantly, the impact of reviewing test results on one’s health and well-being.