reece started out as a stem cell transplant physician looking after leukemia and lymphoma, and moved into the specialty of multiple myeloma when the disease became a target for stem cell transplant in the late 1980s. stem cell transplants replace damaged bone marrow, and the procedure is still offered to people who are considered well enough—typically younger and healthier—to undergo the transplant.
by the early 2000s, new drug therapies were developed to provide control between relapses, extending people’s lifespan and giving them hope.
the more treatment tools in the toolbox, the better
dr. reece notes that advancements in pharmacology have been transformative regarding multiple myeloma treatment.
“we’re milking every bit of benefit out of each drug, as long as it lasts, because the disease recurs. then, if we have another treatment to suppress it, we can get things back on track. but the disease is going to come back, so we depend on having these different sequential treatments,” she notes, adding, “eventually, though, we run out of treatments and then the disease is fatal.”
the most recent step forward for multiple myeloma in the last few years is immunotherapy, giving immune substances, either cells or antibodies, to help the body’s own immune system recognize and attack cancer cells. unlike chemotherapies and other agents designed to directly eliminate cancer cells (also destroying healthy cells in the process), immunotherapy doesn’t come with the toxicity of traditional cancer therapies.
as experts agree, immunotherapy represents a shift in how we think about treating cancer and other diseases with emerging science.
“it’s a very heterogeneous disease and not everyone has a good outcome, so we need lots of tools in the toolbox,” dr. reece says. “there are a number of immune treatments, and if we can use those in sequence, we are now seeing people live even 20 years,” instead of an average of five to seven years that’s typically seen with this type of cancer.