the results
out of the 225,000 participants, those who were tested as being older than their actual age were found to have a higher likelihood of developing chronic illness or already having a chronic disease. they also had a higher risk of early mortality, as well as were in worsened health or “frailer” than those in the group that was found to be of a similar age or lower age metabolically.
these individuals were put into the accelerated aging category. they were also found to have markers that indicated a higher incidence of increased cellular aging and increased risk for age-related diseases.
good health was apparent for those in the decelerated aging group or those who were found to be the same age or younger metabolically. still, the link was not as strong in this group as it was in those who fell into the accelerated aging group. thus, while aging clocks can be used to decrease accelerated aging through early detection and intervention methods, they cannot reverse aging in those who are doing so at a typical rate.
what these systems can do for the general population
the researchers hope that these aging clocks can be used in a widespread way to help identify different health markers that indicate how fast a person is aging.
in turn, they can practice early intervention in people who may be at a higher risk of age-related disease and shortened lifespans by providing them with the tools and information they need to make any necessary changes in their health trajectory, such as getting on new medications or engaging in preventative therapies, as reflected by their results to prevent further health degeneration.
people may also be able to use aging clocks to track their health as they age, enabling them to see where lifestyle changes may be necessary to reduce their risk of early mortality and disease.