and, more significantly, they didn’t have sufficient racial data for the program to recognize what skin abnormalities might look like on a diverse range of skin tones.
most of the photos — 14 of the 21 data sets — provided information about the country the photos came from, but few of them were specific about the patients’ skin colour or ethnicity. and the images that did specify skin colour were overwhelmingly white: out of 2,436 photos with that information, only 10 were of people with brown skin, and there was only one single photo of dark brown or black skin. even fewer photos (1,585) — specified ethnicity. there were no photos of people whose ethnicities were african, afro-caribbean or south asian.
when it comes to something as specific as skin cancer, that’s a significant problem, wen explained.
“research has shown that programs trained on images taken from people with lighter skin types only might not be as accurate for people with darker skin, and vice versa,” he said. “this can potentially lead to the exclusion or even harm of these groups from ai technologies. although skin cancer is rarer in people with darker skins, there is evidence that those who do develop it may have worse disease or be more likely to die of the disease. one factor contributing to this could be the result of skin cancer being diagnosed too late.”
dr. neil steven, who was not involved in the research, but who is a member of the
ncri skin group, said it’s worrying that many non-white people have essentially been left out of the ai skin cancer training so far.
“the findings of this review… raise concerns about the ability of ai to assist in skin cancer diagnosis, especially in a global context,” he said. “we already know that there are not enough pictures of people from black and asian backgrounds in the textbooks we use to train doctors… i hope this work will continue and help ensure that the progress we make in using ai in medicine will benefit all patients, recognizing that human skin colour is highly diverse.