both greenaway and hodgson agree that to continue improving virtual gac access, focus should be placed on referral and billing.
“billing doesn’t just affect doctors but patients, too,” says greenaway. “marginalized patients, whether it be transgender or newcomer populations, are less likely to be enrolled to a family physician’s roster, and without the current pandemic virtual codes, they would have not had access to many virtual services offered by many fee-for-service physicians.”
as of now, the telemedicine ohip codes allowing for virtual care have been extended to
september 2022 but their fate after that is uncertain.
“on the policy level, we need to look at everything from billing codes to funding models to make sure that the way they exist doesn’t then preclude somebody from getting care,” says hodgson.
hodgson also notes that more must be done to make telemedicine accessible to those without technology, in remote communities and the elderly. she also recommends establishing more telemedicine hubs – perhaps in government centres or hospitals in remote communities – where patients can access virtual care privately. “even though they may have the technology at home, they may not have the comfort in their living environment to have an open discussion about their gender identity, with other people around them possibly listening in.”
for alex, who struggles with auditory processing, video encounters can sometimes be challenging, especially if there aren’t automatically generated captions. “it can sometimes be tricky, but for me, in comparison to having to physically go somewhere, it’s still just so much easier.”
both greenaway and hodgson share their expertise with other providers to give them the tools and confidence they need to provide gender-affirming care through the ontario telehealth network virtual consult services.