“when you hear someone’s story, it’s very different [than what you read],” she said. “each meeting [at cadth] starts off with a passionate reading of a patient submission. but it always comes back to what the patient said mattered to them. it’s not perfect, but we are headed in the right direction.”
what is it going to take to bring the patient story to life?
mcgurn went on to describe some goals that cadth has set its sights on, including “fostering meaningful relationships with patients, families, caregivers and patient groups, as well as improving diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility to bring more voices to the narrative.”
for attara, that means patient representatives at the table, actively involved in the discussion — something that has the power to spark what she calls an ‘aha moment,’ when the true impact of the condition on the patient and what matters most to them is authentically communicated and understood.
“you can read [a description of the patient’s experience], have someone else read it, or the patient can read it,” she said. “when someone who has the disease or who represents the person with the disease can convey the experience to the [decision-making] committee, they get the ‘aha moment’ and then we all do a better job. patient voices make a difference in funding decisions.”
asked to comment on the importance of patient input, both in her former role as health minister, as well as patient ombudsman, elliott noted that while lived experience is essential to all parts of the health care system, the patient is not asked often enough what they want from it.
“i think there is a trend toward more meaningful consultation [with patients] now, but we are not quite there yet,” she said. “our system is more institution-based than patient-centric — we have to think about what we need to do to make it truly responsive to the needs of patients.”