though gandhi said he’d clicked on “like” by accident, he also conceded that he had to go: “i recognize that my mistake and others capitalizing on that mistake will be an unavoidable distraction.”
that still left furstenau facing questions from reporters thursday about her own judgment in the affair.
gandhi was associated with other questionable postings — he once characterized the health minister as a “charlatan eugenicist.”
had she vetted dr. gandhi before endorsing him?
“that’s a question for the party,” she replied.
the green party vets candidates. but according to andrew weaver, furstenau’s predecessor, the party leader makes the call on the appointment of a deputy leader.
what about furstenau’s own accusation that henry was “gaslighting” british columbians?
she sidestepped the question the first time she was asked, saying it is up to opposition parties to challenge the government.
did the green leader really think dr. henry was “gaslighting.”
“no,” she replied, but didn’t apologize for attacking the integrity of the provincial health officer.
so went one of those days when the political spectrum seems less like a straight line than a circle where the extremes come at an issue from different directions but end up meeting at the same point.