combined, accommodations in milan and london cost taxpayers $5,044 over five nights.
drover added that the federation isn’t against the government travelling when it serves a legitimate purpose, including strengthening trade relationships or attracting investment. the concern comes, however, when looking at how public money is spent once politicians reach their destination.
“government may have legitimate reason to do travel,” he said. “it’s really just that when this travel does occur, government should be doing it in a way that’s, you know, fiscally responsible.”
paris and boston
the documents also looked at houston’s 2025 trips to paris and boston.
in may 2025, houston spent $2,562.01 on hotel stays in paris, including stays at the marriott paris opera ambassador hotel and the mercure clermont ferrand.
the trip to boston in june that year included a stay for three nights at the sheraton boston hotel costing $1,559.63. the visit was to attend the bio boston international convention and meet with northeastern u.s. state governors.
stricter rules required
while the federation does not believe houston broke any existing rules around travel expenses, drover argued the current restrictions are not strong enough to prevent frivolous spending.
“it’s more so the issue that, you know, when you have a premier that’s telling nova scotians that, you know, they need to find savings, they need to reduce costs,” he said. “leadership starts at the top.”
he said that while he’s not suggesting politicians stay in cheap hotels, he wants cabinet to consider adopting stricter policies that require politicians to choose lower-cost accommodations when they are suitable and available.
the expense reports do not lay out the reason for why the two hotels were selected.
“if the premier has a reason, or the premier’s office has a reason why those are chosen, i’d love to hear from him on that,” drover said.