but hatt then considered the balance of those variables against the original core component of his offence, which was his “egregious breach of trust.”
“evidence was accepted in (a related) hearing about the risks associated with drugs in the facility, including increases in violence between inmates, overdosing, dependence, damage to property and creation of debts between inmates,” hatt said. “mr. mclaughlin knew the packages were shatter and attempted to introduce them into nnscf.
“mr. mclaughlin was bringing the drug packages to mr. denny. it is only logical that mr. mclaughlin was aware that mr. denny would be selling and promoting its use within the institution. in doing so, mr. mclaughlin was creating a risk for every inmate, staff person, and guest within the facility, undermining public confidence and the expectation of safety and the role of rehabilitation in the facility, and by extension, the administration of justice itself. mr. mclaughlin exploited his correctional officer role, a role that provided him with trust and unparalleled access to secure areas of nnscf.”
the pictou courthouse. – herald file
file
once hatt established that overview, she then referenced six comparable cases in canada, including four from nova scotia, to establish a framework for assigning mclaughlin an appropriate sentence.
she described how that review made it clear she needed to send a strong message to the public that mclaughlin’s punishment should fall on the harsh end of the spectrum so that others will be discouraged from following his example.
“these offences are significant and had the potential to have numerous and far-reaching harmful impacts,” she said. “for these reasons, a jail sentence is not only warranted but necessary to bring to bear the full consequences to satisfy denunciation and deterrence, and to uphold the administration of justice.”