“time and again, when i represent individuals like andre, the landlords aren’t actually interested in renovating,” said sarah sproule, the director of legal services at community legal services of ottawa.
“they want to push tenants out. they’re hoping that the n13 notice will be enough. and it often is.”
bill 97 will not stop renovictions, sproule told the committee.
“bill 97 provides no deterrence or protection,” she said. “with bill 97, there are two new things. number one, the landlord must now provide timelines for repairs after a tenant says they want to return. number two, it has increased fines for provincial offenses, which are rarely prosecuted by the ministry of housing. bill 97 is about what can happen after the eviction, after the harm is caused to vulnerable tenants and to our affordable housing stock.”
a
city of ottawa feasibility study released in january 2025 argued that a renoviction bylaw
would be costly. based on hamilton’s experience, it would cost ottawa $2.2 million a year to hire bylaw officers and to pay for other resources to enforce such a bylaw.
the eastern ontario landlord organization has argued that a bylaw would make a handful of renters better off, but only in the very short term, while making repairs and renovations more expensive and time-consuming, thus reducing housing supply.
the motion to put the draft bylaw on the table will be before city council on june 10. if council votes in favour, it would be back in front of the planning and housing committee on july 8, just before council’s summer break and just before the municipal election period. it’s a tight timeline, troster said.
“my concern here is a major abrogation of democracy,” she said. “and, frankly, we’re taking advantage of those people who have to come and spew up their trauma over and over again.”