the same applies to asphalt.
but you can also test whether those ingredients are actually doing what they’re supposed to do.
with asphalt, much of its success, or failure, comes down to the binding agent — bitumen, the sticky petroleum product that holds the rest together. its quality affects how flexible a road is and how likely it is to crack.
“testing doesn’t necessarily improve the asphalt,” says simmons. “the testing ensures that the contractors are not misbehaving.”
if contractors know the city will recover asphalt from the road and test it — and that failure could mean tearing it out at their own expense and starting over — they’ll more likely get it right.
kingston began doing that kind of testing more than a decade ago on princess street, as part of a downtown reconstruction project dubbed the big dig.
once contractors knew the asphalt would be checked after it was laid, and that failing to meet specifications could cost them dearly, the results improved.
“i haven’t seen a failed test result,” says simmons. “not one time.”
that doesn’t mean the testing is unnecessary; it means it’s working.
there are other differences in kingston’s approach. on major arteries like princess street, the city uses higher-grade materials and avoids recycled asphalt in its premium mixes — a decision not without controversy. simmons says he’s not opposed to recycling material, but argues that better systems are needed to ensure its quality.
as for how much longer a properly paved and tested road lasts, the answer isn’t exact. but the difference at least suggests that kingston is doing something right.
simmons points to two comparable roads built around the same time — one using kingston’s stricter approach, the other built using more conventional provincial standards.
the latter began cracking within about four years. the kingston road took about a decade to show similar wear.