“if we do not reach settlement, the next step is legal action,” she told council wednesday. “the results of going to trial may be worse and not necessarily better than the offer currently in front of you.”
as per the city’s report on the matter, the roughriders indicated their opposition to paying the full $3.6 million is not because of financial strain, but because the club did not use mosaic stadium as outlined in their lease agreement for those two years.
anderson said negotiations were “spirited” but “respectful” and reminded that the missing dollars have already been accounted for, so have no financial impact on the city’s books moving forward.
“this is as reasonable as it gets, before going to a court case,” she added.
a spokesperson for the roughriders did not attend the meeting to speak on wednesday.
ward 6 coun. victoria flores asked if the club provided an explanation why. anderson said it was a decision made on the advice of their lawyers.
she later advised councillors to consider the potential harm a legal clash could have on the city’s relationship with the roughriders in the future.
“anytime you end up in court arguing with another entity over something, generally it doesn’t end in a super positive relationship,” said anderson.