gamache said that, in her 27 years of practice, two patients at most would qualify for maid. “it’s really a very minimal number of patients.”
“our organization believes that people with mental disorders should not be treated as second-class citizens, deprived of the right to the same health-care options as anyone else,” she said.
“i don’t know how many maid evaluations will take place exactly, but in my opinion, like my colleague, this kind of treatment, maid, would really be reserved for a teeny, tiny percentage of patients, really the most mentally ill patients,” psychiatrist dr. guillaume barbes-morin, who works in a small community in northwestern quebec, told the committee.
liberal mp james maloney said the numbers are irrelevant. “it makes no difference to me whether it’s a small percentage or a large percentage. the issue we have to deal with is getting it right.”
in a brief submitted to an earlier iteration of the special joint committee on maid, psychiatrist and bioethicist scott kim, a senior investigator with the u.s. national institutes of health, estimated that, based on dutch data, canada could see 2,500 to 5,000 annual requests for maid for mental illness, and an approval rate as high as 50 per cent.
“limited prognostic accuracy” means that at least half would have gotten better, said dr. harvey max chochinov, a distinguished professor of psychiatry at the university of manitoba.
“there is no neutral position,” he told the committee.
“if we wrongly tell patients that they will never get better and open the gate to ending their lives for them, many who walk through will have recovered.”
chochinov said he’s spoken with mental health providers who are frightened “that the minute those guardrails have lifted patients they’ve worked with for years or decades are simply going to choose maid.”