powlowski was not giving interviews in advance of the report’s release wednesday.
an indefinite pause would mean the issue “could recur in three or four or five or 20 years, but for the time being, we would say that we are not allowing maid for mental illness,” powlowski said in may.
“some might argue a clear ‘yes’ or ‘no’ is a preferable answer. some might argue we have to find more consensus. there are some issues that have been identified as key issues, like the issue of irremediability, the issue of being able to differentiate suicidality versus a genuine request for maid for mental illness.
“some people might believe in two or three years we might be better able to answer that question,” he said.
“but i am also sensitive to the suggestion that we should come to a conclusion rather than revisiting this in two or three years” a decision he said would be left to the committee as a whole, “not just me.” powlowski, a doctor who practised emergency medicine for 35 years, is opposed to the expansion of maid for those whose sole underlying condition is a mental disorder.
the committee also heard concerns about the regulatory infrastructure for dealing with complaints related to maid. “we’ve heard that. i think that is relevant. i don’t want to comment on where that leads in terms of a decision,” powlowski said.
while the current temporary exclusion is facing constitutional challenges in court, “i think the big question is, is not allowing maid for mental illness a reasonable limitation under section 1” of the canadian charter of rights and freedoms, he said. section 1 states that rights and freedoms under the charter are not absolute and can be reasonably limited “to protect other rights or important national values,” according to an
official government website.
“that’s really the question,” powlowski said in may. “and we, the elected representatives i think, are the appropriate people to be making that analysis. we are in the process of trying to come to a conclusion collectively on that issue.”