tired of his male friends and colleagues complaining of being criticized for not manning up when they feel fluish, dr. kyle sue set out for evidence that “man flu” is legitimate.
according to his review, men aren’t whiners, but rather the immunologically inferior sex, a phenomenon for which there might be evolutionary explanations.
sue found evidence men tend to have worse symptoms, be hospitalized more, and die more often from influenza than women, regardless of underlying disease.
“the concept of man flu, as commonly defined, is potentially unjust,” sue, a clinical assistant professor in family medicine at memorial university of newfoundland, concludes in the christmas edition of the british medical journal. the annual issue features quirky, peer-reviewed scientific papers based on real data. (“while we welcome light-hearted fare and satire, we do not publish spoofs, hoaxes or fabricated studies,” the prestigious journal assures.)
as sue reported, the oxford dictionary defines man flu “as a cold or similar minor ailment as experienced by a man who is regarded as exaggerating the severity of symptoms.”
“since about half the world’s population is male, deeming male viral respiratory symptoms as ‘exaggerated’ without rigorous scientific evidence, could have important implications for men, including insufficient provision of care,” sue wrote.