“lvef is the traditional imaging method, but we already know measuring gls allows for a better identification of heart damage,” thavendiranathan said. “what we didn’t know is if we can reduce the risk of cardiotoxicity by intervening once this early heart damage is detected.”
while the trial did not achieve its primary purpose — there was no measurable difference in heart function between patients in the lvef or lvef plus gls groups following treatment — simply using gls to continually monitor patients led to a smaller reduction in heart function compared to traditional techniques. it also dropped the risk of cardiotoxicity and helped identify heart damage earlier and in twice as many patients.
“the purpose of a sensitive method like gls is to pick up the presence of disease and treat it early,” said thavendiranathan. “this means more patients will be treated, and if we start heart medications when a change is identified, we can prevent significant worsening of heart function.”
that alone will be welcome news to patients already staring down one daunting disease. “when i was diagnosed, i was scared for my life,” said sindhu johnson, one of the trial’s cancer patients who was randomly assigned to the group that received gls monitoring. “i was willing to undertake any treatment, but i understood my survival may come at a price. and that price included cardiotoxicity.”