stay up to date on this topic
by: sam riches
specifically, dosanjh wrote that some companies were taking a “static” approach to labelling thc and cbd values, where “one potency label is pre-printed and applied across many batches which fall within a pre-determined range to save on costs.”
“we believe this approach to labelling misleads consumers by creating a false impression about the potency of their dried flower,” he noted.
in a letter obtained by the growthop, health canada is now reminding licence-holders that “the thc and cbd content values displayed on a dried cannabis product label should reflect the value as tested for the lot.”
in the letter, which was sent industry-wide, health canada states that “labelling practices in which the thc and cbd values displayed on the label of a cannabis product […] that have not been obtained as a result of cannabinoid testing on each lot or batch of cannabis, may result in non-compliance.”
health canada further writes that labels derived from “historical cultivar-based results or other practices, do not correspond to an accurate measurement of a specific lot’s thc and cbd content values, and may not correspond to the amounts the cannabis product could yield.”
dosanjh, who first contacted health canada about this issue last december, said he’s happy with what the letter states, but would like to see more information about the potential impact of non-compliance moving forward.
the letter “was very clear on what you can and cannot do and how you should be labelling,” he said.
dosanjh added that the discrepancies in labelling practices could amount to millions of dollars in savings and revenue for producers who were taking a static approach.