however, he appealed the decision at the skca, making numerous arguments. the appeal turned on only one.
prior to the jury being selected, whitehawk had brought an application for what’s known as a “challenge for cause.”
he was concerned that prospective jurors could harbour potential bias against him for two reasons. first, because he’s indigenous, and second, because the crown intended to allege he was a member of an indigenous street gang.
he proposed that prospective jurors be asked a series of questions with the hope of weeding out individuals who would not be able to objectively decide his case.
while the trial judge allowed for prospective jurors to be questioned regarding racial bias, he did not allow questions specifically about bias toward street gangs.
appeal court justices brian barrington-foote, jeff kalmakoff and jill drennan unanimously decided the trial judge made a mistake.
“in the end, i am persuaded that the trial judge’s misapplication of the test for determining whether to permit a challenge for cause created a very real risk that mr. whitehawk did not have a trial before an impartial jury,” kalmakoff wrote.
“in other words, his convictions are properly seen as a miscarriage of justice. his convictions must be set aside, and a new trial must be held.”