of all of those animals, they found that 21.1 per cent faced extinction. fifty-seven per cent of turtles and 50 per cent of crocodiles are threatened, compared to 19 per cent of
squamates, a reptilian group that includes snakes, lizards, iguanas, chameleons and other species that shed their skin and have flexible skulls and jaws. within the squamate group, iguanas, xenosaurid lizards, and certain kinds of snakes (shield-tailed and tropidophiid) are the most at risk. (salamanders, which also face a high extinction rate in the 57 per cent range, are often mistaken for reptiles but are actually amphibians, meaning they breathe through gills rather than lungs.)
the reptile species that are threatened are spread out around the world: northern north america, the rocky mountains, southeast asia, west africa, northern madagascar, the northern andes and the caribbean, the kalahari, karoo and sahara deserts, northern eurasia.
“reptiles, to many people, are not charismatic, and there’s just been a lot more focus on the furry or feathery species of vertebrates for conservation,” bruce young, chief zoologist and senior conservation scientist at conservation nonprofit natureserve, which in part led the study,
told cnn.
but even when we may not realize it, to a certain extent, our health and wellness does depend on reptiles.
“if we remove reptiles, it could change ecosystems radically, with unfortunate knock-on effects, such as increases in pest insects,” cox told the guardian. “biodiversity, including reptiles, underpins the ecosystem services that provide a healthy environment for people.”