it says that g.r. and c.m., the adoptive mother who was also a.p.’s half-sister, took s.p. to the emergency department and claimed their four-year-old son had dropped her. the doctors suspected abuse.
s.p. eventually went to live with her maternal grandparents.
“the government entities allowed s.p. to be adopted and left in the care of c.m. and g.r. without appropriate supervision,” alleges to the lawsuit, which seeks damages for s.p.’s lifelong injuries.
the ministry director and ministry staff “failed to protect s.p from neglect, negligent care and physical assault by g.r.,” the claim alleges.
the claim says the adoption assessment of the common-law couple noted “concerns about g.r.’s disciplinary methods,” that g.r. appeared frustrated and raised his voice with his children and that he had scored three out of five on an assessment that showed concerns, including a history of substance abuse and violent abuse.
g.r. was unemployed and c.m. worked three jobs. the assessment noted g.r. was to be s.p.’s primary caregiver but it focused on c.m.’s parenting abilities and rated g.r.’s as “largely unknown.”
“the information obtained from these interviews and from the (assessment) showed … c.m. and g.r. were not suitable to adopt and care for s.p.,” the claim said.